top of page

Journal of

Bioethics in Law & Culture

                                              Quarterly

Fall  2023                                                                                                                                                                  volume 6  issue 4

Submission Requirements

 

Book Review

 

Pushing Roe v. Wade Over the Brink Clarke D. Forsythe & Alexandra DeSanctis

Joe Kral, M.A.

Featured Articles

A Theological Case for Incrementalism After Dobbs

Daniel J. Trippie, Ph.D.

 

The History of Scholarship and Jurisprudence on the Personhood of the Unborn, the Fourteenth Amendment, and Abortion

Mia Steupert, M.A.

Life and Health of Mother Exceptions: Legal and Moral Standards

Chris Maska, J.D.

Legal Briefs

In the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit  

 

STATE OF TEXAS; AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PRO-LIFE OBSTETRICIANS & GYNECOLOGISTS; CHRISTIAN MEDICAL & DENTAL ASSOCIATIONS, Plaintiffs – Appellees,

v. 

XAVIER BECERRA; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES; CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES; KAREN L. TRITZ; DAVID R. WRIGHT, Defendants – Appellants. 

 

AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF APPELLEES AND AFFIRMANCE

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT 

 

COLLEEN REILLY; BECKY BITER, Plaintiffs–Appellants

v.

 CITY OF HARRISBURG; HARRISBURG CITY COUNCIL; ERIC PAPENFUSE, in his official capacity as Mayor of Harrisburg, Defendants–Appellees On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania in Case No. 1:16-cv-00510-SHR before The Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo  

 

REPLY BRIEF OF PLAINTIFFS–APPELLANTS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC22-1050  

 

PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHWEST AND CENTRAL FLORIDA, on behalf of itself, its staff, and its patients, ET AL., Petitioners, 

v.

 STATE OF FLORIDA, ET AL., Respondents. Discretionary Proceeding to Review Decision of the First District Court of Appeal

In the District of Johnson County, Kansas 

Civil Court Department 

 

HODES & NAUSER, MDs, P.A., on behalf of itself, its patients, physicians, and staff; et al. Plaintiffs.

 v. 

KRIS KOBACH, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Kansas; et al. Defendants.

 

RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY INJUNCTION AND/OR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER

State Briefs - Joe Kral, M.A.

 

Federal Briefs - Ana Brennan, J.D.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
bottom of page